Sunday, January 27, 2008

The Arts of Life: A Stan Brakhage Screening


Last Thursday, January 24, I met with the students at the Arts of Life, an art studio for the mentally disabled on the west side of Chicago. I visited the studio for the first time last July and was floored by the skill level of the artists, but mostly found a lot of joy in watching them work and listening to them speak about what they do with surprising clarity and exuberance. Most, if not all, of the painters and sculptors of various ages no doubt knew about popular movies (one artist shouted out the title Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) as his favorite movie), but none had ever seen films that utilize the same techniques and materials they use on their own canvases. They paint on cardboard, plywood, canvas, window panes and found objects; they use materials ranging from acrylic and tempura to watercolors and markers, but they had never seen an experimental film that takes some of the same practices they are familiar with and applies them to a strip of motion picture film stock. I knew the students and artists would be curious to see how the kind of work they do on a canvas translates to a moving picture onscreen, and it was in this spirit that I introduced a series of Stan Brakhage films, to show them for the first time movies of a truly artistic caliber.



I wanted to show the artists a good sampling of Brakhage's work while limiting the films to those that were either painted or constructed with physical objects, like Mothlight (1963), a collage of organic materials stuck to the film with a piece of transparent tape. It was the first movie we watched and the students loved it. Their initial oohs and aahs quickly led to more complex questions and observations, and the group collectively noted things like the tempo and rhythm of the images speeding vertically across the screen. I told them the title of the film and we watched it again. They shouted out each object they saw: grass, leaves, moth wings, and occasionally they named objects that weren't there at all, as if the film administered a kind of Rorschach test.

I brought in a small roll of 35mm color stock motion picture film. I wanted them to feel it and get a sense of its texture. I always think that, as elementary as it may seem to pass around an object like playing a game of show-and-tell, one of the greatest ways to understand the medium is to actually hold a piece of film in your hand; in this, you make a very real connection between the physical object and the ephemeral sight it becomes once threaded through the projector. More simply, I wanted them to see the size of real motion picture film in comparison to their painted canvases--usually feet in width--and understand the intricacies of painting, drawing or etching onto its surface, which is not much larger than the length of a thumb nail.



After three screenings of Mothlight (the film is just over 3 minutes in length), there was a downright emotional explosion in the room when the next two films Eye Myth (1967) and The Garden of Earthly Delights (1981) burst onscreen with their vibrant and energetic colors. The artists loved these, and I do believe this is my first time watching Brakhage where there was response of such unrestrained delight. Surely academic settings call for a more introspective response to the movies, but even in my own private settings I have only witnessed quiet sighs of admiration and affection toward Brakhage's dancing patters of light and color. Hearing their instant visceral response made me excited about these films in a whole new light; it was indeed a reaffirmation of Brakhage's cinematic dexterity.

A minute or two into The Dante Quartet (1987) I asked the class what they were thinking about as they watched. Did it look like any of the paintings they create on a canvas? How was it different? More keen observations about motion and rhythm entered the conversation, and with very little guidance the group agreed the picture was a lot like poetry, only without any words. Before the screening I spoke with each artist and told them what I'd be showing them that day. David, who sat diligently dabbing his brush tip into tacky globs of oil paint, smiled wide when I said hi and told me he once won first place in swimming at the Special Olympics. A half hour later as The Dante Quartet flickered on the television, he eloquently responded to my questions to the class saying, "It looks like a feeling."



For an hour we watched these movies, and more, including Night Music (1986), Rage Net (1988), Glaze of Cathexis (1990), Delicacies of Molten Horror Synapse (1991), Love Song (2001) and more, and with each movie these students with severe mental disabilities (some even confined to wheelchairs, others not able to speak much at all) contributed interesting and exciting ideas.

It was a pleasure to share what still remains to be some rather obscure cinema to the Arts of Life students, and it was even better to witness their genuine appreciation of some of the finest experimental work ever done on film.

If you'd like more information about Arts of Life, visit their website, www.artsoflife.org. There you can find profiles of each artist, browse their work, and buy one of the many amazing paintings, if you are so inclined, which I should add are all reasonably priced, affordable works.


----------
Special thanks to Kodak for their generous donation of 35mm motion picture film used during the presentation. It served as a wonderful teaching tool.

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Liz Stephens - new contributor

Greetings Readers!
My name is Liz Stephens and I am a new contributor to the blog. I am a lover of cinema and an alumni from New York University's Tisch School of the Arts Masters Cinema Studies program. I am also an experimental filmmaker and actor and my all time favorite director is Stanley Kubrick. I have written on trauma and holocaust representation as well as sex and gender. In 2007 I presented my work at the Annual Student Media Conference at NYU and the Music and the Moving Image Conference at NYU. I am also a book reviewer for the journal, Film International.
Clicking on my name above will link you to some of my film reviews.
Looking forward to being a regular contributor to the blog!
Liz

Sunday, January 20, 2008

"The Darjeeling Limited" and "I'm Not There"

There is nothing I like more than a near-empty cinema theatre. The experience of the lights dimming, quiet murmurs in the back row and the sound of the crimson curtains being drawn open does for me what church does for the devout follower. So to usher in 2008 (always a disappointment and utter anti-climax), instead of the usual partying I chose to hole myself up in several theatres and forget the world outside (of which I will review two of the films). I was not sorry.

Always the last to get the good stuff (one of the pitfalls of being south of the equatorial border), the hype surrounding The Darjeeling Limited and I’m Not There was always going to be dangerous. Things seem never to be half as funny, dramatic or frightening after someone has built it up prior. I was pleasantly surprised this time around.

A ticket to ride: The Darjeeling Limited
The Darjeeling Limited is arguably Wes Anderson’s most emotionally accessible film. While littered with the usual odd-bods, strange scenarios and dead-pan humour that have become trademarks of the Anderson oeuvre, there is a simplicity in the narrative that allows the audience to closely, and intimately, follow the stories of the principal characters. Three brothers: Francis (Owen Wilson), Peter (Adrien Brody) and Jack (Jason Schwartzman) rendezvous in India, embarking on a train journey that Francis, the eldest, has organized. It is the first time in a year the brothers have spoken to one another after their father’s death. It is soon revealed that Francis’ motives for the unlikely reunion are to visit their mother (Angelica Huston: aka Anderson’s middle-aged muse) who has become a nun and lives in a settlement at the top of a mountain, and for some old-fashioned sibling bonding.


What should have been a straight-forward itinerary soon goes awry in the most glorious way. A brief affair is had on the train, a pet cobra goes missing, a brotherly brawl results in the pepper spray being implemented, the train gets lost, the brothers are eventually thrown off the Darjeeling Limited. As the train literally goes off its planned tracks, thus starts an unexpected spiritual and personal journey for the trio. From one improbable situation to another, the Whitmans bicker as only brothers do, share prescription medicines and reassess their lives in order to move forwards. There is an endearing quality to their neuroses—Francis cannot help bossing others around (ordering from the menu for his brothers being a case in point), Peter dreads seeing his pregnant wife and insists on wearing his father’s old prescription glasses even though he cannot see with them on, and Jack is in love with a woman who continually breaks his heart (compulsively donning a yellow hotel robe as a reminder). The Darjeeling Limited allows us moments of tenderness, but never sinks in to prolonged troughs of sentimentality. As with Anderson's previous films such as The Royal Tenenbaums and The Life Aquatic of Steve Zissou, The Darjeeling Limited has that trademark humour that borders on the the embarrassingly awkward, the utterly ridiculous, the banal and the brilliant.

My only criticism of The Darjeeling Limited was Hotel Chevalier, the prelude before the full-length feature. While it explains Jack’s depression and obsession in The Darjeeling Limited, I found the ‘quirkiness’ too forced, and Natalie Portman uncomfortably out of place.

Will the real Bob Dylan please stand up: I’m Not There
I’m Not There is Todd Haynes’ latest and much anticipated feature, a postmodern exercise in re-imagining the personae of Bob Dylan that captures Dylan as: “Poet, prophet, outlaw, fake, star of electricity, rock and roll martyr, bornagain Christian.” Eschewing the conventions of the biopic, Haynes’ touch of genius is his sewing together of performances by Christian Bale, Cate Blanchett, Marcus Carl Franklin, Richard Gere, Heath Ledger and Ben Whishaw who are all Bob Dylan at various points in his life and career, or rather facets of Dylan as Man, Musician and Myth. Foregoing linear chronology, the narrative cuts across history with its own temporal logic. Fact and the fantastical sidle one another until it becomes pointless to try and separate reality from the imagined. Narrative structure and characterization work together to reinforce Bob Dylan as an “ever-elusive American icon” who we will never ever really ‘know.’ Any moments of truth’ behind the man are caught like a reflection on the water—crystal clear but then gone in the next instance.


While much has been written of Cate Blanchett’s portrayal of Dylan for which she was recently awarded a Golden Globe for Best Actress in a Supporting Role (in her uncanny likeness and mannerisms, she seems to have channeled Dylan), my two picks were Christian Bale (the prophet) and Ben Whishaw (the enigma). Bale is vulnerable (like a greenstick fracture on the brink of breaking), and Whishaw sprouts lines from Dylan’s interviews like a jaded philosopher beyond his years.

I felt the weakest parts of I’m Not There were of Dylan as the lone gun as depicted by Richard Gere. Drawing upon the mythology of Billy the Kid, this was the most fantasy-laden part of the narrative—replete with a wild west peopled with grotesque townsfolk and carnival freaks. This flight in to fantasy seemed too far removed from the rest of the narrative (which arguably was the point of it), and Gere strangely (mis)cast. Whatever it attempted to accomplish, it didn’t quite get there.

And on that note, a happy 2008 to all. My new year’s resolution: get thee to a cinema more often.

NB: I was attending a Screen Studies Conference in Glasgow July 2007, where Todd Haynes was to be a guest speaker. Due to a late clash with his filming schedule for I’m Not There, Haynes was unfortunately ‘not there’ either. Life imitating art?

In The Claire Denis Queue: Chocolat (1988)



Chocolat (1988) thus begins the first of Claire Denis's filmography that I'll be devoted to for the next few weeks. Originally I had planned to post a nice piece covering her entire body of work once I had seen it all, but given the level of affection I have for Chocolat, which I watched last night, a directorial debut now twenty years in our history, I am forced to share a least a hint of my elation. The narrative takes place in a flashback, where a woman (based on Denis) returns to French colonial Africa many years after her brief childhood residency in Cameroon. The scene is wrought with racial tension, but from the perspective of a child the scene takes on a standard of beauty that in its complete simplicity never touches the bounds of nostalgia. The frame is wide, bright and painterly; the shots are long and naturalistic and capture the landscape in its mountainous breadth, composed often with a depth that ranges from inches to miles in a single shot. Much like Pedro Costa's Down To Earth (Casa de Lava, 1994), nature is a presence overwhelming and shown in almost abstract form against the minuscule size of its characters. Here, the African indentured servant subordinate to heads of house, Marc and Aimee Dalens (François Cluzet and Giulia Boschi), Protée, played by Isaach De Bankolé, originally from the French colonial country, Ivory Coast, is also the lead in Costa's Down To Earth; in both films his character, too, is at the quiet mercy of nature, more so than his white co-inhabitants who have the money and power to afford air and automobile travel to come and go, more or less as they please. While the landscape is wide and seemingly without borders, Protée is bound to the countryside in a way profound to his masters; one, I suppose, never quite understands the pain of what it's like to be from a place, no matter how sublime in beauty, he is not allowed to leave. France (Cécile Ducasse), the young woman who has returned to Cameroon after all these years, realizes, short of reuniting with Protée, that leaving the country is the only choice she has of further reconciliation with the racially tense past she remembers; there will be no commiserating, nor reflecting with sentimentality on old times that were never glorious anyway. The memories, rather, have the plain beauty of being lived through, and that's enough.

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Golden Globes Canceled

Well-- the title pretty much says it all. Due to the Writers Guild strike, the ceremony and telecast of the awards show will be scaled down to a press conference during which the winners will be announced. Whoop-diddy-doo.

New Blog News! Campaign Stops






For those closely following the 2008 presidential primaries and general election, you'll be glad to know this Monday, January 7th, the New York Times released a new blog run by pundits, David Brooks, Ron Klain, Matthew Continetti, Andrew Kohut, and Gail Collins (who was also the first woman to become the editor of the Times Editorial section.) Campaign Stops is a great chance to hear extra editorial from an array of authorities as the political news unfolds.

This is the cherry on top of the Times' brilliant move last September to remove the "TimesSelect" feature, letting all readers catch up on the Op.Eds without paying a fee.

Happy Election Season!

Uncharacteristic Late Afternoon Update:
Speaking of new blogs, White House Press Secretary Dana Perino is writing what I believe is the first Presidential blog in history, though she isn't calling it that. The "blog" is clinically labeled "Trip Notes From The Middle East", a title that makes the Presidency a little less trendy and cutting-edge, and a little more rickety. I guess the White House wants it to read like an old-school epistolary, or, as Perino puts it, "just a little bit of a blog".

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

Barbie Was a Prostitute

Did you know there are more Barbie dolls in the U.S. than human beings? Or that Barbie was fashioned after a German prostitute doll named "Lilli"?

This Saturday, January 12th at Chicago Filmmakers, I, Doll The Unauthorized Biography of America's 11 1/2" Sweetheart (1996) screens as part of the "Dyke Delicious" series, and should be fun for anyone annoyed by the unrealistic body image the ubiquitous doll promotes. The fun starts at 7:00pm for social hour (which I imagine might include drinks?), and a screening of director Tula Asselanis's film follows thereafter, at 8:00pm. It's ten bucks, and though that's a hearty helping of dough to fork over for a movie in the Midwest, it'll be worth the financial sacrifice; I Am Legend will be running for awhile yet. Try something new in only the second weekend of the new year!


Also, Scarlett contributor, Karen, recently brought to my attention a new film currently in production that's slated for release this fall called My Mother's Beauty Cream. It's directed by Mitch McCabe--don't be confused by the name, she's not a boy. McCade runs her own production company Chipped Nail Polish Productions. You can read more about the production on its MySpace page, and read McCabe's bio here.

The tagline: One filmmaker's comical journey through America and the Anti-aging industry, set against the backdrop of her plastic surgeon father.

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!

Holy shit, it's 2008!!!!



Cheers! To a great new film year in 2008!

XO,
Scarlett