Friday, March 30, 2007

Attention All Screenwriters/Filmmakers!

Hey, all. It's that time of the year again. The 29th Annual IFP Market is calling for entries from filmmakers & screenwriters from far and wide! Details follow below...


Deadlines beginning May 4


About the 29th Annual IFP Market


The IFP Market is a national program connecting projects with financiers, producers & programmers before they're completed & on the festival circuit. More than 1,000 industry professionals attend the IFP Market for pitch meetings, speed dating meetings, screenings, and social events. Each year approximately 200 projects are invited to participate (50% docs; 50% narrative screenplays) and take one-on-one meetings with potential financing partners or co-producers. In 2006, more than 1,800 pitch meetings were arranged with buyers on behalf of filmmakers. The IFP Market will help you:

- Connect with financiers & producers
- Network with festival programmers
- Meet distributors, broadcasters and sales agents


Categories

- Emerging Narrative - for writers and writer/directors seeking producers
- No Borders International Co-Production Market - for veteran producers with partial financing seeking additional partners
-Spotlight on Documentaries - for filmmakers in production, post, or with a completed film seeking financing partners, distribution (theatrical & broadcast), and festival invitations


Juried Awards

- $5,000 - Artistic merit for an Emerging Narrative Screenplay
- $10,000 - Best Socially Conscious Documentary presented by The Fledgling Fund
- $10,000 - Emerging Latino Documentarian presented by The Fledgling Fund


Fees/Details

- $40-$50 to submit / $300-$450 due upon acceptance (depending on section). Go to http://www.ifp.org/ for details.
- Acceptance includes full registration to the concurrently run 5-day Filmmaker Conference
- IFP Market takes place: September 16 – 20, 2007, NYC
- Questions: marketreg@ifp.org or call 212.465.8200 x222.

Sunday, March 25, 2007

A Little More on All The President's Men

Talking on the phone has never been so interesting. After watching All The President's Men again now for the...well, I'm not exactly sure how many times, but suffice it to say "many," I am stunned to see how exciting a medium shot that zooms to a close-up of Bob Woodward (Robert Redford) talking on the phone can be.

Here he is:

There is one shot on the phone that lasts for 6 minutes. All the while we watch Woodward bounce between two separate calls, scribbling notes as he pieces together information that ultimately reveals the corruption of the Nixon administration. There are two reasons why this long shot duration is a risk for director Alan Pakula to take to modern audiences: 1) we already know the outcome of the investigation, so suspense can be difficult to maintain in this instance; and 2) the shot is static, with only one main character within it that looks off into a space we never see. Look for this sequence (I believe) about half-way through the film, and see how it sucks you in ever so slowly. Redford's pretty face surely doesn't harm our gaze, but there is sense of urgency in the moments that he picks up the facts of the case that make us feel as if we are living through them ourselves. (Next year a book edited by Scarlett Cinema's own Christina Lee features an article on this very subject written by Yours Truly, called "Violating Time," which details cinematic instances that transport us back in time. Updates on this will be announced as we get them.)

For the life of me, I will never get tired of this film. Every time a new detail emerges that makes the story deeper, and every time the shadowy structure of the Watergate complex lingers in the background--subtely, quietly, like a ghost lurking--I am terrified. I used to say Oliver Stone's JFK was the only other detective movie that made me switch on the lights while watching alone in my dark apartment, but as the years pan out, Stone's homage to government conspiracy can't hold a light to the paced fright in APM.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

My 2 Cents...

Greetings from the Great White North! Finally, finally, finally, I'm going to suck it up and make my first official contribution...

But to begin with, a brief introduction. I too am one of those crazy people who simply love movies. So much, in fact, that I took a leave from a fully funded PhD program in theatre back in 2003/04 to join fellow bloggers Pamela, Karen, Sarah and Michelle in the NYU Masters program in Cinema Studies. You've already heard from Pamela & Karen what kind of debt this causes. Now, work in the exchange rate for a poor Canadian girl and you'll get a sense of what I'm talking about. I really love movies.

In particular, I'm a sucker for all things Humphrey Bogart, Orson Welles, Martin Scorsese and Christopher Guest. I'll also talk your ear off about William Shatner and Bruce Campbell if you give me the chance. (In fact, part of my PhD course work involved an argument about William Shatner and Christopher Plummer as primary examples of a 'Canadian' acting style. But I digress...) Recently, as I was teaching Laura Mulvey to a bunch of 4th year undergrads, it struck me that most of my filmic obsessions are those things stereotypically positioned as masculine pleasures. Not sure what to make of that right now, but food for thought, nonetheless. Perhaps something to discuss here, later on...

For now though, what initially drew me to this site (aside from Pamela's all-encompassing enthusiasm!) was its focus on showcasing new voices in film and film criticism. Personally, I've never really experienced the kind of frustrations (re: getting to talk about movies) that some of the contributors here have mentioned, but that's pretty much because I very rarely share my opinions (incoherent babbling about Bogie, Bill and Bruce aside!) Call it the stereotypical Canadian inferiority complex if you will; whatever the reason, I have a hard time confidently discussing my views. Especially amongst people - like the other ladies here, and everyone reading, no doubt - who know movies. So... for me, posting will involve overcoming a personal hurdle of sorts. Terrifying, but fun!

Most likely, you'll see me chiming in about performances of identity in documentary films (subject of my thesis in that aforementioned PhD program), or about things to do with the classes I've been teaching this year (insanity on film, theatre and film, and film theory). Who knows though, maybe I'll start off by regaling you with my opinions about Bon Cop, Bad Cop - without a doubt the best movie I've seen in a long time. But that's another story...

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Andy Dehnart's Pointless Rant on American Idol



Some weird stories are in the news lately that try to discredit American Idol as just another trend in the pop culture ether that "has begun its decline." According to Andy Dehnart for MSNBC.com, "the phenomenon is over." Dehnart contradicts his argument by the fourth sentence of his column ("To be clear, American Idol is not going anywhere"), but he seems to want to stand out among the masses reporting on the muscle of the show's powerhouse ratings; Idol, which most assumed would flop, or prove itself as a superficial talent search simply has not. Though Dehnart sure seems to wish it has. He claims that all of the conversation about Idol appeals to base interests, with commentary on Antonella Barba's media slogging, for instance, and the absence of chatter on what makes the show entertaining, and hence, a bloody success.

He must not watch the show, because what continues to make Idol exciting is the new talent to look forward to. Melinda Doolittle and LaKisha Jones are two of the most sensational performers in the show's history
(at least from where this critic perches); it is the anticipation of what singers of their caliber will stun us with in the weeks to come. There's a sneaky hope that the amateur we're watching on stage is the next Diana Ross (who is this week's guest talent and mentor), and even better that we are the ones who get to pick her; not only are we watching musical history, but we get to help shape it too. There is an odd thrill to the ring of Seacrest's voice when he tells us in the last seconds of the show that "the lines are open."

American Idol has momentum. It's not just about the awful auditions in the first few weeks of the season. Idol is about seeing a piece of music's future, not a platform to lament the worst. On the same token, part of what makes the show compelling is the diversity of the judges remarks, the varying styles (or scales of talent) in the contestants, and finding out which singer 2/3rds of the population picked come Wednesday night--it's like the election returns, only every week!

"At best, a third of the top 12 are interesting performers with distinct styles; the others are forgettable," Dehnart concludes. And who can argue with that? Not me. I wish I cared two peas for any of the boys this year, and Simon has said it, the competition is rather limited to three from the group of girls: LaKisha, Melinda, and Jordin. I don't have a crystal ball so I can't predict if this is a sign of the show's decline. But the fact that not all 12 are at the same skill level, or have the ability to hold the audience's attention in the same way, is an unfounded way to say the show is on the outs. Dehnart, it is clear, just doesn't like the show. He should just say so instead of ranting on the millions who do.

Thanks to Camille for dropping word of Dehnart's article.

Sunday, March 11, 2007

The Society for Cinema and Media Studies - Conference '07



The Society for Cinema and Media Studies conference is here in Chicago this year, and for those unfamiliar, it's an annual meeting of minds in film criticism with scores of paper presenters from around the world. Panels begin at 8:00am and end at 8:00pm. It's a grueling day for the folks who stick it out that long, but I have only been ducking in and out for a handful of presentations. Today will conclude with a bang, a panel on "Film and the Sublime" with Chicago's cinema hero, Tom Gunning. (I call him Emperor Gunning.) A full report of the conference will be up in the next couple of days (maybe in conjunction with R. Emmett, who was also in attendance, on Termite Art?), so stay tuned.

Wednesday, March 7, 2007

On to More Important Matters

Completely unrelated to film, media, or television, but very much a relevant topic for women. Please read below....

***********************************************************

Hello all,

Women's shelters in the U.S. go through thousands of tampons and pads monthly. Assistance agencies generally help with expenses of "everyday" necessities such as toilet paper, diapers, and clothing, but one of the most BASIC needs is overlooked - feminine hygiene products. (Yes, sexism is still
alive and well.)

Seventh Generation, a green paper products and cleaning products company, will donate a box of sanitary products to a women's shelter in your chosen state - just for clicking the link. Talk about easy (and, yes, it is legitimate)!


I just did it. Will it stop the violence against women? No. But with only

3 clicks, you can give something to someone who needs it. Pass it on.

Thanks.

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

Reality TV, Hollywood, & the Bastardization of Broadway


Something has happened to
America. And it ain't pretty.

Or rather, it is pretty. Pretty in a mainstream, bourgeois, pop-flavored, and often vulgar kind of way. And that's basically the problem: mind-rotting mediocrity veiled in an attractive package.


I'm speaking more specifically of 2 things: America's manic obsession with celebutantes and biddies such as Paris Hilton and Mischa Barton, who are only marginally talented (if not talentless) yet command legions of rabid fans who would do no less than sell off their first-born children in order to attain the same levels of flagrant opulence, idleness, and scandalous behavior (hey, here's a whole movie about that subject!). The second phenomenon is how we are beginning to feel the more disturbing repercussions of this obsession in the performing arts. Case in point: American Idol.


The most recent clamor over Season 6's contestant Antonella Barba and her party-girl antics is symptomatic of the way in which reality television has seemed to have bamboozled the majority of Americans into thinkin
g that the truly unextraordinary are worth hailing as our worthiest (for lack of a better word) idols. I don’t think it out of line to suggest that anyone who has been following the show and actually cares about musical talent should be outraged that Antonella has even lasted this far. Nevertheless, it seems that America has chosen to place the entertainment value of her scandalous, tabloid-worthy exploits at a premium over the show’s actual performances. Thus, the most confounding result of all-- and not as it applies only to AI, but to our post-modern culture in general: many Americans these days seem only inclined to embrace “reality” (whatever that means) so long as it is a mediated one.

This is both a sad and disturbing trend as one considers that most American media is controlled by a select few who can hardly claim to be appropriate representatives or delegates for America’s increasingly diverse population; the same is especially true if one is speaking purely in terms of the Hollywood dream machine.

For eons, we humans have both proliferated stories as well as mythified heroes in order to sustain dreams to which we may someday aspire or, in most cases, into which we can escape. However, it wasn’t until recently, with the invention of the motion picture, that these dreams took on a radically new dimension within the framework America’s collective dreaming. Suddenly, it appeared as if our dreams could come to life on the screen; in a way, they could be realized… and be distributed in the form of a mass-produced commodity. Unlike theater, whose artifice is a given and whose art can never be reproduced from one night’s performance to the next, movies seemed to be able to “capture” reality and could be screened, bought, and sold depending on how quickly manufacturers could turn out the reels. It came as no surprise then that with the rise of the Hollywood studio system that movie moguls such as Carl Laemmle and Adolph Zukor began to turn to the Great White Way in order to amass their own personal arsenals of showgirls, starlets, and bona fide talent to act in their pictures. Along with these lucky recruits came thousands of others who migrated to California each year with hopes of someday getting their “one big break.” Indeed, not only did the Hollywood Dream Machine generate big profits from its box office revenues, but it ensured that would-be celebrities for generations to come would continue to buy into the idea that they, too, could attain unimaginable fame (or infamy; pick your poison), wealth, and glamour.

The reality was, however, that most people who attempted to make it in the biz never did and instead either nursed their heartache in drugs and alcohol or were resigned to settle into their reinvented but ordinary lives. Meanwhile, back on Broadway, the most elite of America’s truly gifted stage performers continued to uphold the tradition of theater as an art-- not as a venue in which only the merely beautiful could achieve some sort of acclaim (the best Antonella could have even hoped for up until the 1990s was to make it as a chorus girl). Thus, ‘tis a pity that ever since Broadway underwent a pop music, Disney makeover and reality television programming gripped America in its exploitative, wife-swapping, race-baiting, and unspectacularly chaotic grip that even the theater no longer remains hallowed ground for those truly committed to performance integrity.

What am I talking about, you might say?

Consider that back in the ‘90s, one began to see more and more “guest” appearances by film and television celebrities acting in the featured roles of several very high-profile musical revivals and plays (Whoopi Goldberg and Rosie O’Donnell both played Pseudolus in A Funny Thing Happened On the Way to the Forum; Brooke Shields and-- yes-- Rosie O’Donnell played Rizzo in Grease). This trend has become even more commonplace in the new millenium (Natalie Portman in The Diary of Anne Frank and Chekhov’s The Seagull; Julia Roberts in Three Days of Rain; and Sean “P. Diddy” Combs in A Raisin In the Sun). Granted, film and television stars performing on Broadway is nothing new. Yul Brynner, after all, was the King in The King and I; and actors such as Ethan Hawke, Mark Ruffalo, Nathan Lane, Sarah Jessica Parker, and Julianne Moore continue to grace the stages of New York at least once a year. The difference is that this latter group came from the world of theater, were trained there, and actually honed their craft on the stage whereas names such as Julia Roberts and Sean Combs arguably have no place acting in plays (unless they are being filmed on studio lots, with craft service, lighting crews, agents, personal assistants, and stylists in tow). Clearly the decision to cast the former group was based more on the celebs’ speculated drawing power-- the producers having witnessed these star personas translate into box office smashes and platinum record sales-- rather than on their abilities as stage performers (which were oftentimes untested). Hence, what would eventually be the influx of mediocre Broadway stars had begun to trickle in. The dam inevitably broke with the juggernaut that is American Idol.

I won’t go too much into the travesty that is the current state of American musical theater (and how Hollywood has turned it to absolute rot). However, a quick survey of the most successful shows currently running in New York’s theater district includes the following titles: The Lion King, Beauty and the Beast, Tarzan, Mamma Mia, Hairspray, Spamalot, and The Producers. All but one are based on Hollywood films; and the one that isn’t relies entirely upon the musical stylings of a 1970s pop music group from Sweden. Looking ahead to the 2007-2008 theater season, other musicals slated to hit Broadway with a bang this fall are Edward Scissorhands (I kid you not), The Little Mermaid (Disney asserts its dominance once again), and Legally Blonde (shoot me). So much for cutting edge theater.

What I find even more tragic is the recent push by Broadway producers to capitalize upon American Idol mania, consequently lowering the bar even more for the standard of quality for which the theater was once known. In fact, not only is Broadway incapable of boasting any truly original and innovative shows these days (with the exception, perhaps, of Spring Awakening), not only have we seen a reversal in the flow of genuine talent from the stage to the screen (thus subjecting us to the torture of actresses like Brooke Shields pathetically huffing and puffing their way through renditions of “There are Worse Things I Could Do”), but now the stages of New York are being inundated by such mediocre talent as Constantine Maroulis that one wonders if there’s any integrity left in the theater at all. In a bid to prolong their fifteen minutes of fame, those who would never have been discovered otherwise are using their credits from reality television to bum-rush the stage just one more time-- no matter the cost to their own personal dignity or that of their fellow cast-mates.


I’d like to b
ring this post to a close with an anecdote.

Recently, a few weeks ago, I traveled back to the Garden State (that’s New Jersey for those of you not in-the-know… or haven’t seen the movie) for a dentist appointment. As I was waiting in line for the bus at the Port Authority, I heard my name called out from amidst the crowd that had gathered on the platform. Turning my head, I was delighted to see an old familiar face, my high school friend, Douglas Ullman. Even at age 14, those of who knew Doug had an inkling that Doug had something special. Having sung with a variety of professional-level choirs throughout his childhood, Doug scored the lead in the high school musical his freshman year (and every subsequent year afterwards), consistently earned a spot in New Jersey’s Bergen County choir, eventually sang with both the State and All Eastern choirs, and wound up attending New York University’s highly selective undergraduate musical theater program. Since graduating, Doug has had a fairly successful go at breaking into the professional theater world, first having toured in an international production of The Sound of Music playing Rolfe, and lately playing Matt in the current Off-Broadway production of The Fantasticks.

In the course of our impromptu conversation, I asked Doug what his future short-term plans were: would he soon look for another production in which to act or did he plan on remaining in the cast of The Fantasticks for as long as the producers would have him? With a sheepish grin, Doug admitted that the producers had opted not to renew his contract. When I indignantly asked him why, Doug’s answer made me so angry I could have shouted if not for the many onlookers who were clearly already eavesdropping on our little exchange: “They’re bringing in someone from American Idol.”

As our respective buses pulled up to their gates, Doug and I began to head in our opposite directions. I wished him well on his future auditions, to which he said thanks and that he had actually just come from an audition for The Little Mermaid.

Seriously. Someone shoot me.


Sunday, March 4, 2007

A Belated American Idol Recap: What's With All the Tears This Week?



For any American Idol devotees who missed the show last week, I say with confidence that you didn't miss much. For last week was "dedications week," meaning the producers set up each contestant for tears as they dedicated their song to thier Grandma/dad/boyfriend/wife/dog/etc. Simon described the sentiment best (shock), though, after Brandon Rogers neglected his criticisms: "I like puppies." I wished LaKisha would have dedicated her song to the rest of the girls on stage, as a nice reminder that she is superior to them all.

But let me retract that last statement for a minute, because this week proved that there are indeed a few girls in contention with LaKisha. Melinda Doolittle, humble as always, has so much control over her voice--and such a clear tone. If she doesn't win Idol I don't think it's a stretch to say she'll have a long and high-paying career ahead of her. The same should also be said for Sabrina Sloan, who, though her performance wasn't as strong as it was the week prior, probably doesn't need a microphone when she's up on stage her voice is so strong. I love them both. For now, though, I pledge allegiance to LaKisha.

Antonella Barba was in a dead heat with Sanjaya Malakar for the two bummer performances of the week. Both should have been voted off--they simply aren't good enough!--but as we know, Idol has a history of being a beauty pageant as much as a talent competition, which accounts for Antonella, but what about Sanjaya? He's only just "cute." Who'd of thought that would be enough to score him votes? Either way, rest assured that the battle of the beauties will end soon. There was a slip up back in Season 3 when Jasmine Trias made it to the top 3, since she had the entire state of Hawaii voting on her behalf, but even in this case she is 10-times the better singer than Antonella and Sanjaya combined.

One thing for sure is that the girls are going to be hard to beat. Chris Richardson and Blake Lewis are the two fellas up front at this juncture. The rest of the guys are just sort of boring. Fellow Scarlett blogger and Idol addict, Camille, said it best: the guys are "nerdy" this year. If it ain't the truth!

Also one BIG wardrobe mistake this week was Gina Glockson's slinkly red Nicole Miller cocktail dress. It was Cling City, and not flattering. Meanwhile, pretty baby Antonella was wearing no less than a retro-print trash sack, ala the Olsen Twins fashion disasters. Kelly Clarkson said it right, "it was Ghetto Idol" when she was on the show; but now they've got stylists and budgets to keep bad dress choices from happening. Someone's sitting down on the job, and all I've got to say is that if you're going to spend in the upwards of $400 for a designer dress at least get one that flatters.

A salute to the 4 fallen contestants this week: A.J. Tabaldo, Alaina Alexander, Nick Pedro, and Leslie Hunt.